Uber Licensing Agreement

Ara 19, 2020   //   Yazar: admin   //   Genel  //  Yorum Yapılmadı

In December 2014, Kentucky imposed rules on ridesharing companies including annual licensing declarations, basic reviews and driver liability insurance. [292] You and Lyft agree by mutual agreement to waive our respective rights to resolve disputes before a court by a judge or jury and to agree to resolve any dispute by arbitration, as shown below. This conciliation agreement (“arbitration agreement”) is governed by federal arbitration law and is in place after the end of the agreement or the end of your relationship with Lyft. Any arbitration proceedings under this agreement take place on an individual basis; Class arbitration procedures and class actions are not permitted. Unless expressly stated below, this Arbitration Agreement applies to all claims (hereinafter referred to) between you and Lyft, including our subsidiaries, subsidiaries, parents, successors and beneficiaries of the transfer, as well as to each of our respective executives, directors, employees, representatives or shareholders. This arbitration agreement also applies to claims between you and Lyft`s service providers, including, but not exclusively, on background verification service providers and liquidators; and these service providers are considered to be the third-party beneficiaries of the arbitration agreement. In September 2013, the CPUC voted unanimously to make the agreement permanent and created a new category of services called “transportation network company” to cover Lyft, UberX, SideCar and Summon, making California the first jurisdiction to recognize these services. [271] [272] Many municipalities, governments and organizations have established rules and regulations that specifically govern wrinkleharing businesses. In some legal systems, for-profit ridesharing operations are totally illegal. [1] Requirements may include requirements for driver background checks[2][3] regarding the number of drivers[4] and licensing. [5] In February 2016, Taxi drivers in Kiev protested against the lack of admission requirements for rideshare drivers. [342] On December 5, 2012, Toronto officials charged Uber with 25 municipal licensing violations, including the operation of an unauthorized taxi brokerage and an unauthorized limousine service.

[49] Municipal officials stated that they had advised the company to comply with local regulations and that licenses had been issued to competing taxi-dispatch applications. [50] Despite the support of some parties, including Mayor John Tory, the Toronto Police Service has taken tough action against Uber drivers. [51] In July 2015, a $400 million class action was filed in Toronto against UberX and UberXL on behalf of taxi and limousine drivers, brokers and owners in Ontario, who claimed that Uber had violated Section 39.1 of the province`s Highway Traffic Act by picking up unauthorized passengers and transporting them for compensation. [53] In March 2016, Sukhvir Tehethi, a local taxi driver, filed a restraining order against Uber to cease operations. [54] A Toronto City Councillor warned that passengers using UberX could be fined up to 20,000 $US. [55] On March 3, 2016, after several hours of heated debate, Toronto City Council passed a bylaw authorizing UberX to work legally in the city with conditions, while complying with taxi rules. [56] In April 2018, Poland announced new licensing requirements for ridesharing companies such as Uber and Taxify. [187] Helen Chapman, director of licensing at TfL, said, “While we recognize that Uber has made improvements, it is unacceptable that Uber has authorized passengers with drivers who are not licensed and who are not guaranteed to board minibs.” The Lyft platform offers a marketplace where people looking for transport to specific destinations (“Riders”) can be combined with means of transport to such destinations.

Yorumlar kapatıldı.