Where Do Executive Agreements Come From

Ara 21, 2020   //   Yazar: admin   //   Genel  //  Yorum Yapılmadı

The ex ante executive agreements of Congress are similar to many administrative provisions, as they are often based on vague or broad legal authorizations and are concluded by a large number of executive agencies. Some of the same concerns expressed in the framework of administrative regulation – legality, the registration of interest groups, reckless or corrupt bureaucratic measures, etc. – are also related to ex ante agreements between Congress and the executive branch. But there is at least one key difference: administrative provisions are subject to a complex administrative framework, but ex ante agreements between Congress and the executive branch are not subject to administrative law or any other accountability framework that goes beyond an incomplete and unreased reporting obligation. Although the Supreme Court did not address the issue directly, many courts and commentators agree that provisions of international agreements that would require the United States to exercise powers that the Constitution assigns exclusively to Congress should not be considered autonomous, and that enforcement laws are necessary to confer such provisions on domestic legal effects.117 Sub-jurisdictions have concluded that Congress controls the power of money. Because Congress controls the power of the wallet. 118 Other leading jurisdictions have proposed that provisions of the contract purporting to create criminal liability119 or increase revenue120 should not be considered self-processing, since these powers are the exclusive prerogative of Congress. Customary international law plays a direct role in the U.S. legal system when Congress includes it in federal law through legislation.

Some statutes explicitly refer to international law and allow courts to interpret their requirements and contours.245 Thus, federal law prohibits “the crime of piracy under international law . . . .” 246 And the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act removes protection against legal actions granted to foreign sovereign nations in certain categories of cases where property rights are “held in violation of international law.” 247 In a letter last month, we described the sharp decline in the president`s use of Article II contracts – reaching a new low point in the Trump administration, which has introduced only one such treaty in the Senate. This decline does not mean that the United States has stopped entering into international agreements. Each year, the United States concludes dozens of binding international agreements – often more than 100 – but generally does so in the form of an “executive agreement of Congress” (i.e. legislated agreements) and not Article II. As a result, the United States has effectively converted to an administrative regime for drafting international agreements, but it has not yet put in place an adequate system of control and accountability to comply with that regime.

Yorumlar kapatıldı.